From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAFB1387FD for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCF45E0BA8; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4DBAE0B80 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062A633FF24 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.538, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhXAV7E2eAuG for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05C533FF53 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wujad-0004g4-7X for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:33:23 +0200 Received: from athedsl-352244.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.231.146]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:33:23 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-352244.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:33:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with v86d Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:33:07 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <5805.1402463655@ccs.covici.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-352244.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: <5805.1402463655@ccs.covici.com> X-Archives-Salt: 932a4cc8-0fd3-4c8a-9089-b201f0e284f0 X-Archives-Hash: 010b45969da15b7d6922e3664c8de31d On 11/06/14 08:14, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Hi. Does anyone have a clue as to why v86d should suddenly start being > very cpu intensive on my computer? When I first boot its fine (using > either systemd or openrc), but after a while -- maybe a day or two it > starts using up lots of cpu and definitely increases the load average > and slows down things. I notice this has not changed in several years, > so I am wondering if it is not working as it used to? > > Thanks in advance for any ideas. It's probably not v86d itself, but whoever is using it. But I don't know how to find out for sure. I didn't notice anything like that myself though. But that might be because my machine isn't running for that long (I turn off my PC when I don't need it.)