From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-148898-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31681381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:29:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92009E0A6F;
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D8EE0908
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:29:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C59A33E9C0
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-0.915, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id HjswckWx6gKy for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC2833E9DA
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:29:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1V1xtd-0001IL-Dh
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:10:21 +0200
Received: from athedsl-356461.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.248.11])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:10:21 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-356461.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:10:21 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage 2.2
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:06:53 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <ksog0s$te1$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAGBogHy9KkDsNmVS-aCOb82rcDgnMLRnBwaEn9PWmDp10D7yxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-356461.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
In-Reply-To: <CAGBogHy9KkDsNmVS-aCOb82rcDgnMLRnBwaEn9PWmDp10D7yxQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: b62d7924-f61d-4b11-ba4b-e79bf23c3467
X-Archives-Hash: f197e4c8df274b2b597d0630dfbc7c4b
On 24/07/13 13:00, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> What is the status or portage 2.2?
> It takes so long to get out of alpha. Has anyone here had any serious
> problems with it? I've been using it for a a few years without any
> accidents. Just wondering if I should be prepared for the worst.
> I also remember reading in Changelog that 2.2 remains masked until 2.1
> gets enough testing, that was ages ago.
To me, it looks more like 2.2 is some sort of "eternal testing" version,
and features from it are added to 2.1 over time.
Now this might not be the intention, but it sure looks that way.