From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0BF1388BD for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50CD221C002; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01230E002B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ECD33DEE4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:06:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.246 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-2.445, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlXokZlDYAIk for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCCC33DEEB for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3BGF-0004UZ-UX for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:06:27 +0100 Received: from dsl.comtrol.com ([64.122.56.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:06:27 +0100 Received: from grant.b.edwards by dsl.comtrol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:06:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Fonts (Ariel?) broken in acroread Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl.comtrol.com User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 58eacc58-2894-40ad-a243-a08865fede61 X-Archives-Hash: 7335d68ceb1d261540791c2e02216413 On 2013-02-06, Grant Edwards wrote: > I don't know when exactly, but sometime in the past 6 months or so, > font support in acroread got broken. Most of the PDF documents > generated by MS Office don't render correctly. I think the most common > font that doesn't render properly is Ariel. Acroread didn't used to > have any problems with these documents, and viewing them with out > applications seems to work OK. Blerg. That should read "viewing them with _other_ applications seems to work OK". IOW, emacs, epdfview, and mupdf all render the document using the correct fonts. > http://www.panix.com/~grante/acroread-vs-emacs.png -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I just went below the at poverty line! gmail.com