From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C271381F3 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8111021C0AB; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2BB21C02C for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F3833D913 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.217 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.973, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KlOoUeWXA54d for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C702333D902 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmT4B-0000zT-3y for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:40:55 +0100 Received: from athedsl-350278.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.223.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:40:55 +0100 Received: from realnc by athedsl-350278.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:40:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: does texlive-2012 have the media9 macro? Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:40:20 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-350278.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: aee94e1f-b4ea-489c-9a35-3a88970138b0 X-Archives-Hash: 08beadb9b571efdddd1c55dc2a30a94c On 22/12/12 19:32, Valmor de Almeida wrote: > Hello, > > I have texlive-2011 installed into my gentoo version at the moment > (recent portage updated) and the latex media9 macro is not there. I > could use the ~amd64 keyword to get the unstable version 2012 of > texlive emerged but before I try that I am wondering how do I find out > whether media9 is included in the newer texlive-2012. I'm on texlive-2012, and dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra-2012 seems to have it: /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/media9/media9.sty