From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DB31381F4 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19317E05F8; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33887E0534 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9792E1B403C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-2.589, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=0.865, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7mW5iV3eqJM for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D891B4029 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T0cTo-0003u8-D8 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:01:36 +0200 Received: from 69.234.176.177 ([69.234.176.177]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:01:36 +0200 Received: from w41ter by 69.234.176.177 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:01:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet? Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:01:19 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20120812115031.424f2bcaf60b88561216bf97@ukr.net> <20120812135313.f144157a81c81073b6a989e6@ukr.net> <20120812143352.GB2883@ca.inter.net> <20120812174439.GD2883@ca.inter.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.234.176.177 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: <20120812174439.GD2883@ca.inter.net> X-Archives-Salt: 8fb9ce8d-19ee-4ab1-b81e-02a7009d0ec8 X-Archives-Hash: cbd251c9d500fb62d93ddbc39e0562c3 On 08/12/2012 10:44 AM, Philip Webb wrote: > 120812 Philip Webb wrote: >> 120812 v_2e@ukr.net wrote: >>> Looks like developers have already caught this issue. >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428328#c8 >> I'll try merging again with USE="xmlsec" , as the bug fix recommends. > > Yes, it compiled with that flag. > While it used less memory than 2 emerges ago, > it used more disk space ( 4 GB ) & took much longer ( 3 h 2 m ). > OTOH it also opens almost at once, so I'll take the trade-offs. I'm glad to hear that because I'm still failing to build it on three machines :( Did you add xmlsec to your make.conf, or use it in the command line when emerging libreoffice?