From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691FC13800E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEECFE0678; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F92E05FA for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7899C1B406A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.967 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.967 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-2.158, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ap6lfh1ZRjfb for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9671B4063 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Szor5-0003w8-AT for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:02:19 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-184-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.184.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:02:19 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-184-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:02:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet? [SOLVED, maybe] Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 06:02:07 -0700 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-184-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 91112c25-6428-4695-b733-f8a7b19d521b X-Archives-Hash: 9b8eddfecedd118c5f8135dac624087f On 08/09/2012 01:19 PM, walt wrote: > > ...the ebuild is using only one CPU out of four, so this is taking > much longer than before. Ugh. Well, since there are at least four of you who don't have any problem with libreoffice it must be something on my two machines with the same trouble. This morning I noticed that perl was updated, so I ran perl-updater and now the libreoffice build seems (fingers crossed) to be building at normal speed using all CPUs again. The reason I think it was a perl problem is there are multiple processes going during a libreoffice build that look like this: perl -S /var/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.0.4/solenv Before I ran perl-updater there was always one process marked at the bottom of that list of perl processes, and now there seem to be four parallel perl processes in place of that one -- I guess one for each CPU :) I'll let the build run while I go to work, hoping I have a working libreoffice when I get home. Thanks for the feedback.