From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140287-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E1413800E
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:45:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D450DE04C8;
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:45:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD73E0508
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C561B401D
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-0.112, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Yl2qboPhsEZu for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:44:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC091B4025
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:44:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1Sw4JM-0004p8-CF
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:44:00 +0200
Received: from athedsl-343842.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.198.192])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:44:00 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-343842.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:44:00 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: x32 ABI
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:43:41 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <jv7nq1$grn$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <CAKkyAYYLSddr7F2uL_ZfZYjNq508zhCWaEiPJSQuXS+WnGAhYQ@mail.gmail.com> <jv7hcc$cq5$1@dough.gmane.org> <CA+czFiA2_3N90+cD7wXQDhs3=PT8wzZ89tt9ZVmt3rQ1Uc=iZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKkyAYatZj2Z-766Z8P=mFmUJOHkHM_U45jEM4dWj4bgO_j4Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-343842.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120720 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKkyAYatZj2Z-766Z8P=mFmUJOHkHM_U45jEM4dWj4bgO_j4Ag@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: a4704534-3aa3-4a99-9ff4-97ed45e16f5c
X-Archives-Hash: c637fa4ba2e3a3b1f881a67682db0e3d
On 31/07/12 07:16, Alecks Gates wrote:
> I have just started the process of installing Gentoo from scratch on
> on my 2GB RAM machine, and am going to fully compare the two, probably
> using Phoronix Test Suite unless someone here can give me some other
> recommendations -- I don't do benchmarking and I like how you can do
> the comparisons with OpenBenchmarking.org. Hopefully Phornoix Test
> Suite runs properly, I suppose I'll have to install php and the like.
There's app-benchmarks/phoronix-test-suite. It's 3.8 rather than 4.0
though. I've no idea whether 4.0 has anything important in it though.