From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrqIQ-0000SH-M7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:57:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E57BE04C7; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1998EE04C1 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C411B404F for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.138 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.138 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.129, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlE_GRT4Vers for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72321B4037 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SrqGK-00069y-Ub for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:55:24 +0200 Received: from athedsl-354262.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.239.116]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:55:24 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-354262.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:55:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:55:06 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <3200326.C1v6ghYEo5@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-354262.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120607 Thunderbird/13.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 82897813-717c-48f8-901b-90a21a6abdba X-Archives-Hash: 4ececc35e8707dfeb154bec7109848fc On 18/07/12 00:14, Alecks Gates wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> 64-bit Wine cannot run 32-bit Windows applications. You need a 32-bit Wine >> for that. And since in 99.9% of Windows software is 32-bit... well, you get >> the point :-) >> >> > Sure, but 64-bit wine can run either a win32 or a win64 config, and > you have to enable win64 with the "win64" USE flag. I believe this > makes the win64 config default and you have to set WINEARCH=win32 if > you want only 32-bit. Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing. That's certainly news to me :-)