From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Sivbx-0006Js-K8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:48:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77B77E09C4; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7905E09BB for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DA91B4037 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.105 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.096, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elnAE2_dCkkC for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931381B404E for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SivZi-0003ii-LS for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:46:34 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-198-108.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.198.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:46:34 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-198-108.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:46:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: eselect binutils list not matching Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:46:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-198-108.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 23bd6fa0-d6ba-45f4-966d-4f0966609aa6 X-Archives-Hash: 8a27e8071c7814f8e6f2b1cab7aa9866 On 06/24/2012 03:18 PM, walt wrote: > On 06/24/2012 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> Hi, One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect: >> >> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list !!! Error: Pattern does not >> match any installed version of binutils! exiting > And then there's the dreaded option of forcing an fsck on the bad machine, but you knew that already :(