From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SZIyn-0001Bw-B1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:44:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE6E9E079C; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F7BE0774 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5AD1B4024 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:43:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.204 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.194, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRW3Sp56LG40 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4EF1B401F for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZIwz-0000vX-UE for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:42:49 +0200 Received: from athedsl-343589.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.197.195]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:42:49 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-343589.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:42:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: ~gcc-4.7.0 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:42:04 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <4FC3DA4E.9030009@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-343589.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120529 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4FC3DA4E.9030009@xunil.at> X-Archives-Salt: 93a6a255-b9d4-4132-8e5c-125465840d54 X-Archives-Hash: 9420e4f7b51e8b624f924d893e6e619c On 28/05/12 23:04, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > As GCC-4.7.0 appeared for ~amd64 now ... > > anyone recompiled system or world with it already? > > More advantages or disadvantages? Since you didn't mention any specific workloads (like audio or video compression), I assume you're a typical desktop user (internet browsing, email, watching movies, listening to music, etc.) There will be no differences in performance with GCC 4.7.