From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SUdcD-0003bf-7G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:46:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77B98E07B7; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C204E0733 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104FA1B401B for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:44:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.143 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.133, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9IXcsuU26jG for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 296331B4008 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUdaC-0004Ow-IE for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:44:00 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-188-22.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.188.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:44:00 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-188-22.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 14:44:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Runlevels, ordering initscripts and running them in background Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:43:50 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4FB367FA.2050705@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-188-22.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0 In-Reply-To: <4FB367FA.2050705@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 0f7b617e-0137-4c22-9768-94da6dd79c80 X-Archives-Hash: 0ff7c72c83d5ab7010af8e70f738f5fb On 05/16/2012 01:40 AM, Ignas Anikevicius wrote: > I want to do this, so that I do not have to wait while non-crucial > services are being started I can barely remember when I was young enough to care about saving a few seconds. (But, good for you :) Have you heard of systemd? Yet another evil conspiracy spawned by Lennart Poettering, father of pulseaudio and scourge of old fossils (like many of us here) who avoid any form of progress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd My evil twin, Walter Dnes, has been agitating for systemd in this mailing list for months. He actually knows how systemd works and can be persuaded to... well, I expect he'll be along shortly to tell you about it.