From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SSsEV-0001KR-1O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:58:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4A5E0AC3; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1601E07E2 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4547C1B4044 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.353 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.343, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaYv3JQz5lk0 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945341B4033 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSsCU-0005c3-Cc for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:56:14 +0200 Received: from athedsl-231892.home.otenet.gr ([85.74.225.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:56:14 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-231892.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:56:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean asking to remove *many* perl Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:55:37 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-231892.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 076d2aba-683b-4ed0-bfda-a886534d4943 X-Archives-Hash: 16d1bbe7342132adc04cb658c61443dc On 11/05/12 17:39, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > A recent world update followed by depclean resulted in a request to > remove nearly 30 dev-perl packages (plus an old boost). > > I don't use perl, but wonder what triggered this change. I have not > changed any use flags. > > My inclination is to let depclean have its way, but wanted to check here > first in case this looks suspicious to anyone. Something dropped the perl dependency. Same results here. I let it remove it and there were no problems.