From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SS5ni-0001BA-Dg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 12:15:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20AB0E0853; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA45BE0841 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436CD1B405B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:11:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.254 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.244, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6o4KN-eRJG88 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05A51B404C for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SS5jm-0008AF-F7 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:11:22 +0200 Received: from athedsl-355610.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.244.184]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:11:22 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-355610.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:11:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: mplayer2 idle CPU condumption Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:10:46 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <20120509133159.458b85e4@weird.wonkology.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-355610.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20120509133159.458b85e4@weird.wonkology.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4cf9c500-563a-40a9-bacd-2adcfa59d800 X-Archives-Hash: c715c5e50b35639ba9377cdc97daefd6 On 09/05/12 14:31, Alex Schuster wrote: > When you pause mplayer2 playing any kind of video, does its process also > use 100% of one of your cores? Nope.