From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S94K0-0002iV-TJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:50:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D6ADE0788; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E5CE0778 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D401B401A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:49:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEzstF6MRyH7 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165B41B4007 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S94Ih-0004IW-VO for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 01:48:47 +0100 Received: from athedsl-345247.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.204.61]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 01:48:47 +0100 Received: from realnc by athedsl-345247.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 01:48:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd? [ Was: The End Is Near ... ] Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:48:30 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <709768995.843751.1331957483491.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com> <20120317115300.GB3615@acm.acm> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-345247.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/11.0 In-Reply-To: <20120317115300.GB3615@acm.acm> X-Archives-Salt: 59553fb7-b4e8-46ba-ada6-7c786f9ace7b X-Archives-Hash: f9930e8e21db1418653858a160f160bd On 17/03/12 13:53, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Nikos. > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:25:48AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >>> Happy Computer Users, systemd is on your horizon. > >> No, we don't. I hope systemd arrives soon. It's the best init system I >> ever saw. > > What's so good about it? What will it do for me? > > I have this horrible sneaking suspicion that it will be more complicated > than /sbin/init + OpenRC, just like udev + initramfs is more complicated > than udev, and CUPS is more complicated than classical lpr. > > Why do you find it so good? No idea. I only posted this because the OP didn't say what's bad about systemd :-) I really don't know I should care whether my system runs OpenRC or systemd.