From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-135767-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S3MhR-0007LI-JM
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:14:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B94B4E070F;
	Fri,  2 Mar 2012 07:14:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C39DE08AD
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2012 07:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D3B1B400D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2012 07:13:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
	tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
	SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
	autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id uS629B01okPW for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Fri,  2 Mar 2012 07:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49DE1B4004
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2012 07:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1S3Mfm-0004eW-Uv
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:13:02 +0100
Received: from athedsl-347424.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.212.190])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:13:02 +0100
Received: from realnc by athedsl-347424.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:13:02 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Autoloading modules..,
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:12:48 +0200
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <jiprtl$6ju$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <20120302042216.GC2998@solfire> <CADPrc83MXQX8R4drkQ9cQ88fvbN+MpznjiN-LKzXnzWyAcrDcQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120302043614.GD2998@solfire>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-347424.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120302 Thunderbird/10.0.1
In-Reply-To: <20120302043614.GD2998@solfire>
X-Archives-Salt: 093a402c-a0b8-4bd4-a101-036017f886ba
X-Archives-Hash: af8ccd7bce02e667d994092476526c8f

On 02/03/12 06:36, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote:
> I heard -- not only in this list -- that loading modules, that
> supports hardware, is better than integration the according
> modules into the kernel.

Nope.  It's exactly the same.  The only instance where it's "better", is 
when you need to unload it again later.