From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S0hqP-0001nx-9T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:13:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD929E0DCA; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580EDE0D9C for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69A31B4007 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:11:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.889 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id USkuYB2Iggir for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FE41B4009 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S0hp2-0007Zo-C7 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:11:36 +0100 Received: from athedsl-343073.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.195.191]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:11:36 +0100 Received: from realnc by athedsl-343073.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:11:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:11:21 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-343073.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 6aa3bec9-f19d-4624-a620-0dcf7e3bb985 X-Archives-Hash: e160b2554e10c8c14a96ef91237f049c On 24/02/12 00:59, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Paul Hartman > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong wrote: >>> Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? (It >>> always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a copy >>> of firefox marked, in parenthesis, 32 bit.) >> >> They're working on it... They actually have started generating 64-bit >> nightly builds for Windows and Linux: >> https://nightly.mozilla.org/ > > What is it about my systems wherein every one of these https links > case my systems to barf with a "This Connection is Untrusted" message. > If I remove the 's' then things work fine. > > Is there some part of Gentoo config that should take care of this but > that I don't know about? Nope, you can't do anything about that. The warning appears because Mozilla is using a certificate that was issued for "www.mozilla.org" and "mozilla.org", but the actual domain is "nightly.mozilla.org". You always get a warning when that happens. HTTP does not use encryption and certificates, so in that case you will never get anything like that.