From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RzZOa-0001VH-3s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:59:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC383E002C; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AF3E0BA3 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B266443E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:58:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.653 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.808, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRmXPDKwInrD for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168671B4004 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RzZNH-0001AJ-3J for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:58:15 +0100 Received: from 69.234.176.169 ([69.234.176.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:58:15 +0100 Received: from w41ter by 69.234.176.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:58:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge using 100% CPU Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:58:02 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20120220093708.GA20163@malaquias.DHCP-GERAL> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.234.176.169 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20120220093708.GA20163@malaquias.DHCP-GERAL> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 743a9b86-15d4-4e10-b4c8-db7717efbe71 X-Archives-Hash: e9f90c0f86b59de786a7d150a98156b1 On 02/20/2012 01:37 AM, Jos=E9 Romildo Malaquias wrote: > Hello. >=20 > Recently emerge behavior became strange on my ~amd64 system. When a > package fails to compile, emerge does not terminate, but goes to 100% o= f > CPU usage. Is anybody seeing this too? >=20 > # emerge --version > Portage 2.1.10.47 (default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop, gcc-4.6.2, glibc-2= .14.1-r2, 3.2.6-gentoo x86_64) No such problem on my ~amd64 (but I'm staying with gcc-4.5.3 for now). Portage is a collection of python scripts, so you might want to run python-updater just for insurance. Which version of python is your portage using? (See the useflags on your sys-apps/portage package.)