From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RzZ2D-0006kH-1F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:36:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C369EE0B64; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D2CE0B64 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833CA1B400D for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:35:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.655 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.655 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.810, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqiM1EFUYHs9 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7271E67FB5 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RzZ0m-0006LP-45 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:35:00 +0100 Received: from 69.234.176.169 ([69.234.176.169]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:35:00 +0100 Received: from w41ter by 69.234.176.169 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:35:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gnupg: can't use keyservers Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:34:47 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4F3CCB09.2040903@xunil.at> <4F423917.6080808@xunil.at> <4F427383.2060308@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.234.176.169 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4F427383.2060308@xunil.at> X-Archives-Salt: ebacdeff-e32e-4201-8658-4231e522a367 X-Archives-Hash: ac33471307dc1c19fab40c845e76ee0f On 02/20/2012 08:23 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 20.02.2012 16:47, schrieb Mick: > >> Well, I did not have such a problem last time I tried - although every >> now and then I have found that the key servers get busy and >> connections do not succeed. >> >> Have you tried connecting to a different keyserver? > > Yep, I did. Also tried it manually via shell (gnupg-commandline). > > Same error: > > : can't connect to `subkeys.pgp.net': host not found > gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Not found Have you sniffed your network traffic to see if gnupg is actually sending anything?