From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsj3W-0002mU-8u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:53:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF91CE083E; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BEEE077F for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C37D1B401C for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:52:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.253 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.243, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V2mArgFxXCu9 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632271B4013 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsj27-0006kz-98 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:52:07 +0100 Received: from adsl-69-234-192-153.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.192.153]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:52:07 +0100 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-192-153.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:52:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: /usr/lib/libgdbm_compat.so.3: undefined symbol: __guard Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:51:51 -0800 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-192-153.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120106 Thunderbird/9.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 367eb015-632b-44d2-a0ca-c4a6a1480d88 X-Archives-Hash: 1325eccb237a90a453fedf47bd86287e On 02/01/2012 08:01 AM, Grant wrote: > I get this when emerging python on a system I'm bringing up to date > after 3 years of non-use: > > *** WARNING: renaming "dbm" since importing it failed: > /usr/lib/libgdbm_compat.so.3: undefined symbol: __guard I've never run a hardened machine, though it's really time I tried it. libgdm_compat.so.3 links to /usr/lib32/libgdbm.so.3 and (on my non- hardened) machine neither library needs anything with __guard. I think the 'guard' must refer to stack protection or similar that you find only on hardened systems. Something very vague in my memory associates 'multilib' only with non-hardened systems -- but my memory could be wrong instead of vague :) Are the 32-bit compatible packages available in hardened versions?