From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RV6jH-00072p-B2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:19:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFB2021C233; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B1521C22C for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710401B400D for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:16:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.278 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.178, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.201] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MsDYzItPdZSp for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CCE1B400F for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RV6h3-0005YZ-9X for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:16:45 +0100 Received: from athedsl-389078.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.71.212]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:16:45 +0100 Received: from realnc by athedsl-389078.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:16:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6? Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:16:45 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <4ED28F6A.7090606@alyf.net> <1322483386.66469.4.camel@stretch> <4ED3BDD4.4060704@binarywings.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-389078.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111117 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <4ED3BDD4.4060704@binarywings.net> X-Archives-Salt: a72a5e74-d47d-4b4a-9419-6199008fda8f X-Archives-Hash: f12d341d0827d691307d4818db0e2397 On 11/28/2011 06:59 PM, Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 28.11.2011 17:15, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >> On 11/28/2011 02:29 PM, Albert W. Hopkins wrote: >>> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:28 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote: >>>> With 100% repeatability, mind you, which does raise same questions on >>>> the amount of testing done before release. Yes, it's ~arch and >>>> rc_parallel is explicitly marked "experimental", but it's not expected >>>> to be completely and consistently broken, either. >>>> >>>> If that sounds like I'm ranting, it's because I just spent about an >>>> hour >>>> getting three machines affected by this problem back into working >>>> state. >>>> >>>> If anyone still has it installed, it's time to sync and downgrade :) >>> >>> Sorry to add more to the whining but... >>> >>> Yes, you are in the testing tree. Yes, as a member of testing, *you* >>> expect things will occasionally break, and it is *your* job to test >>> things, break them, and report bugs. >> >> Generally true, but not when something is obviously broken. That means >> not even its upstream dev bothered to test it. >> >> ~arch is for "we think this works, but please give it a go in case there >> are problems". It's *not* for "we have no idea if this works because we >> didn't even try it once". > > Do you have any idea how much time you can spend with the kind of system > testing you propose? About 2 minutes? Enabling the parallel startup thingy and rebooting the machine. There you go :-/