From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-129318-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RBC2y-0007Ks-Lw
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:57:04 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FB9D21C26E;
	Tue,  4 Oct 2011 20:56:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7914221C231
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2011 20:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0A21B4029
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2011 20:55:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -5.389
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.389 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.210,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id YnbDD32iyyV5 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue,  4 Oct 2011 20:55:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409D1B4013
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2011 20:55:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1RBC13-00010V-PV
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:55:05 +0200
Received: from dsl.comtrol.com ([64.122.56.22])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:55:05 +0200
Received: from grant.b.edwards by dsl.comtrol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:55:05 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is grub2 stable and who uses it?
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 20:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <j6frlo$t0s$2@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4E8AD6C4.7070901@gmail.com>
 <20111004110746.395635e0@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
 <j6f5ju$lg5$4@dough.gmane.org> <4E8B1DD3.7050709@gmail.com>
 <20111004221351.30474a04@rohan.example.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl.comtrol.com
User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-102 (Linux)
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 83ef36151ecf17b2c7337ff42f427766

On 2011-10-04, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:

> No that's a completely different issue.
>
> But the warped thinking that produces it is exactly the same.

QOTW!

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! I need to discuss
                                  at               BUY-BACK PROVISIONS
                              gmail.com            with at least six studio
                                                   SLEAZEBALLS!!