From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127207-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Qv9ih-0001wU-GM
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:13:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A32221C23D;
	Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3B721C0D3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799E11B4016
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.953
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.953 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.646,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id tV5Q59sGqt-c for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8147A1B4028
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1Qv9gZ-0003vK-F9
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:11:39 +0200
Received: from athedsl-378610.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.30.240])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:11:39 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-378610.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:11:39 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Suspend to RAM caused crashes
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:12:00 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <j2r76u$rh9$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <201108211127.57077.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201108211319.40825.francesco.talamona@know.eu>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-378610.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To: <201108211319.40825.francesco.talamona@know.eu>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 9bd84070a22bbf952e4236e754bc1a70

On 08/21/2011 02:19 PM, Francesco Talamona wrote:
>  I wish yours it's not a RAM
> issue, it could be tricky to spot, because memtest is not putting any
> load to the machine, so it's very useful when it reports error, but when
> it doesn't you can't be sure if RAM modules are in good health.

CPU load doesn't affect RAM errors.  CPU load affects CPU errors.  If 
you only get RAM errors during heavy load, the RAM is just fine, but 
your CPU has a fault.