From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QrxZX-0002lg-R0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:39:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAE0421C470; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDB221C410 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4FE1B4079 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:23:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -4.992 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.992 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.607, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-wS7Q8K5R49 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AE31B4042 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrxJl-0007q0-53 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:22:53 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-190-1.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.190.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:22:53 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-190-1.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:22:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Plasma-runtime compilation problems Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:22:41 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1312947259.12939.4.camel@laptop.limeyworld> <10767017.YZF3DYoQc4@pc> <2380316.dSHcnf9Jls@pc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-190-1.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: <2380316.dSHcnf9Jls@pc> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8b52179b5682fcfd0f5cf66683ac7138 On 08/11/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi Walt, >> Hm. I know I've seen compiler redefinition messages thousands of times >> over the years. > Maybe what you saw as a warning was some kind of macro redefined. > > ~ $ cat bar.c > #define BAR 0 > #define BAR 1 > > int main() > { > } > > ~$gcc bar.c -o bar > bar.c:2:0: warning: "BAR" redefined > bar.c:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition Yes! I spent an hour writing variations on the theme, trying to reproduce that warning, and failed. Thanks for clearing that up :)