From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it?
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:02:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <iv9n0h$ouq$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4368337.24pI982QGQ@nazgul>
On 07/09/2011 10:26 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2011 18:39:04 Stroller did opine thusly:
>> On 8 July 2011, at 16:19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> Two USE flags: gtk2 and gtk3
>>>
>>> DEPEND="
>>> gtk2? (x11-libs/gtk+:2)
>>> gtk3? (x11-libs/gtk+:3)
>>> "
>>>
>>> in src-configure() write the code such that it establishes a
>>> precedence
>>
>> This is the way it was done for gtk vs. gtk2, but the bug has been
>> updated since I first read it (over 24 hours ago) and apparently
>> the Gnome team don't want the two separate flags in the future.
>>
>> I'm not really a gtk or Gnome (or X11) user, so I don't really know,
>> but the two separate flags did strike me as a bit of an ugly /
>> clumsy way of doing things.
>
> It's also the only mechanism I know of to do it.
>
> If the ebuild will support two toolkits and the choice of which to use
> is based solely on a user's preference, there is only one way to
> resolve that - a precedence list. There's no way around that.
There's also mutually exclusive USE flags (there's an eclass for that),
which is what the submitted patch did.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-06 16:35 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it? Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-06 17:23 ` pk
2011-07-06 19:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-06 20:02 ` pk
2011-07-06 20:41 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-06 22:53 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-07-06 23:06 ` Dale
2011-07-06 23:20 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-06 23:21 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-07 3:04 ` Dale
2011-07-07 17:42 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Orlitzky
2011-07-07 19:36 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-07 20:01 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-07-07 20:47 ` Dale
2011-07-07 20:57 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-07 21:03 ` Dale
2011-07-08 4:42 ` 微菜
2011-07-06 18:02 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-07-07 2:12 ` 微菜
2011-07-07 2:45 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-07 3:31 ` 微菜
2011-07-07 7:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2011-07-07 12:07 ` Stroller
2011-07-07 22:50 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-07-07 23:40 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-07-07 16:44 ` [gentoo-user] " pk
2011-07-07 17:14 ` Mark Knecht
2011-07-07 23:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-08 12:11 ` [gentoo-user] " Stroller
2011-07-08 13:14 ` Albert Hopkins
2011-07-08 15:19 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-08 17:39 ` Stroller
2011-07-09 7:26 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-09 14:02 ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2011-07-08 17:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-08 19:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Albert Hopkins
2011-07-08 20:32 ` Stroller
2011-07-09 16:28 ` William Hubbs
2011-07-09 20:24 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-08 18:03 ` Stroller
2011-07-08 13:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='iv9n0h$ouq$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=realnc@arcor.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox