From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-125338-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QexQg-0005xA-F6
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:52:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5B5221C07D;
	Thu,  7 Jul 2011 22:50:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D3E21C07D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Jul 2011 22:50:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383072AC079
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Jul 2011 22:50:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.921
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.921 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.678,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id E1DNsBcqlm-U for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Thu,  7 Jul 2011 22:50:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D5D2AC081
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Jul 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1QexPA-0005Oo-Nt
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:50:44 +0200
Received: from adsl-69-234-176-133.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.176.133])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:50:44 +0200
Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-176-133.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:50:44 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support
 it?
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:50:31 -0700
Message-ID: <iv5d7n$680$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <iv22qr$bga$1@dough.gmane.org> <4E15161B.30202@fedoraproject.org> <6461919.NtEmo2L7JZ@nazgul> <2323C479-222F-44CC-A9F8-73F87AE4FB31@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-176-133.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To: <2323C479-222F-44CC-A9F8-73F87AE4FB31@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 03283252a8acd90a53a7b9cf5c141157

On 07/07/2011 05:07 AM, Stroller wrote:
> Ubuntu users complain sometimes about similar things (such as Unity),
> about their bug reports being marked as WONTFIX, but their devs seem
> generally politer and more ready to explain their reasons than Gentoo
> devs.

IIUC the ubuntu devs are employees of Canonical, or at least the lead
devs are.  I dunno if ubuntu includes volunteer devs or not.