From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-125037-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Qd6Pr-0001W4-Az
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:03:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDE0C21C067;
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBC421C067
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B65C2AC039
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.908 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.691,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id wsXDXVHdnOZB for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750801B405A
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:02:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1Qd64l-0001Y7-A6
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:41:59 +0200
Received: from athedsl-389136.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.72.14])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:41:59 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-389136.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:41:59 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Time for hardware upgrade(s)
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:42:16 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <iuns9s$7r4$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <CAN0CFw0x_MwK5e2mJBZ35EB8OJyNjevm7_4=+1hqNkxhFfHEGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN0CFw3VnRwYLbGJCq9bGPZjR-cg6vsFHVnokM57NEpB52M73Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-389136.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN0CFw3VnRwYLbGJCq9bGPZjR-cg6vsFHVnokM57NEpB52M73Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: dffbabf625dfc02cf3e75003906c6a5f
On 07/02/2011 09:06 PM, Grant wrote:
>> The most important thing is reliability and Linux compatibility but I
>> also need HDMI and I figure USB 3.0 is a good idea. The system is for
>> playing music and movies, no gaming whatsoever. If you're familiar
>> with the current hardware scene, where would you go from here as far
>> as a motherboard and other components? Any features a Gentoo'er
>> should look for?
>>
>> - Grant
>
> Is Nvidia still the way to go instead of ATI?
Yep. Unless you have old ATI hardware. Current hardware doesn't work
well. Since he wants to buy new stuff, NVidia is recommended.