From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-123078-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QO3qi-0000p4-Rv
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:17:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEAF31C052;
	Sun, 22 May 2011 08:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88EB1C052
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEBF1B4021
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.857
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.857 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.742,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ORKpL9cG5Z1e for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sun, 22 May 2011 08:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA711B401D
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1QO3p7-0002rO-UZ
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 10:15:41 +0200
Received: from athedsl-375585.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.19.31])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 10:15:41 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-375585.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 May 2011 10:15:41 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Inkscape-0.48.1-r1 really sloooooow
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 11:15:28 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <iragmq$m6a$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <BANLkTikow1pvU5O9M=gr7k-VV_xCL4hXvA@mail.gmail.com> <4DD85011.4060009@orlitzky.com> <201105220857.02028.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-375585.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110430 Thunderbird/3.1.10
In-Reply-To: <201105220857.02028.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: fbb0ec01beb798ef42ec5a5b9430613e

On 05/22/2011 10:56 AM, Mick wrote:
>[...]
> I have now looked a bit more into this problem and it seems that inkscape is
> slower in MSWindows (dual boot machine).  So I concluded that this is an
> inkscape issue, rather than Gentoo specific.

FWIW, Inkscape is quite slow here too.  Core 2 Duo 3.4GHz with 6GB RAM.