* [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
@ 2011-05-20 22:34 walt
2011-05-21 8:35 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2011-05-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
I'm surprised that this problem hasn't already been posted here.
For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.
The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
installed on your machine. A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p
The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
in Nikos's bug report.
Happy week-end to all :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
[not found] <gUGG5-1X7-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2011-05-21 3:24 ` Indi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Indi @ 2011-05-21 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:50:01AM +0200, walt wrote:
> I'm surprised that this problem hasn't already been posted here.
>
> For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
> dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.
>
> The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
> installed on your machine. A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
> Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p
>
> The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
> in Nikos's bug report.
>
> Happy week-end to all :)
Thanks for that. I upgraded my ~x86 laptop today and a bunch of things
did break but revdep-rebuild appears to have handled it.
I have bison-2.5, but am using libreoffice-bin which seems fine.
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
2011-05-20 22:34 [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 walt
@ 2011-05-21 8:35 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2011-05-21 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]
On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:34:59 -0700, walt wrote:
> For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
> dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.
Although LO appears to continue working fine without the rebuild, at
least for my basic usage.
> The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
> installed on your machine. A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
> Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p
>
> The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
> in Nikos's bug report.
There's a patch to fix this without downgrading at
--
Neil Bothwick
QOTD:
The only easy way to tell a hamster from a gerbil is that the
gerbil has more dark meat.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-21 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-20 22:34 [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 walt
2011-05-21 8:35 ` Neil Bothwick
[not found] <gUGG5-1X7-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-05-21 3:24 ` Indi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox