public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
@ 2011-05-20 22:34 walt
  2011-05-21  8:35 ` Neil Bothwick
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2011-05-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

I'm surprised that this problem hasn't already been posted here.

For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.

The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
installed on your machine.  A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p

The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
in Nikos's bug report.

Happy week-end to all :)




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
       [not found] <gUGG5-1X7-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2011-05-21  3:24 ` Indi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Indi @ 2011-05-21  3:24 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:50:01AM +0200, walt wrote:
> I'm surprised that this problem hasn't already been posted here.
> 
> For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
> dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.
> 
> The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
> installed on your machine.  A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
> Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p
> 
> The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
> in Nikos's bug report.
> 
> Happy week-end to all :)

Thanks for that. I upgraded my ~x86 laptop today and a bunch of things
did break but revdep-rebuild appears to have handled it.

I have bison-2.5, but am using libreoffice-bin which seems fine. 

-- 
caveat utilitor 
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ 




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
  2011-05-20 22:34 [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 walt
@ 2011-05-21  8:35 ` Neil Bothwick
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2011-05-21  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]

On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:34:59 -0700, walt wrote:

> For you users of unstable gentoo: the recent update of 'icu' broke
> dozens of packages (as it always does) including libreoffice.

Although LO appears to continue working fine without the rebuild, at
least for my basic usage.

> The problem is that libreoffice fails to build if you have bison-2.5
> installed on your machine.  A gentoo bug report was filed by our own
> Nikos Chantziaras -- who did not post a headsup to this list :p
> 
> The fix is to downgrade bison to the 'stable' version 2.4.3, as stated
> in Nikos's bug report.

There's a patch to fix this without downgrading at


-- 
Neil Bothwick

QOTD:
	The only easy way to tell a hamster from a gerbil is that the
	gerbil has more dark meat.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-21  8:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-20 22:34 [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 walt
2011-05-21  8:35 ` Neil Bothwick
     [not found] <gUGG5-1X7-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-05-21  3:24 ` Indi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox