From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-122597-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QKf3C-0007Nj-0s
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:12:10 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87A621C01C;
Thu, 12 May 2011 23:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CCD1C01C
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45891B4038
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:10:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.532 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599,
RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AKKaIx86E1BL for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 12 May 2011 23:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE121B4036
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:10:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1QKf1O-00027T-68
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:10:18 +0200
Received: from 178.233.18.17 ([178.233.18.17])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:10:18 +0200
Received: from masterprometheus666 by 178.233.18.17 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:10:18 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: masterprometheus <masterprometheus666@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Will the next auto-build stage tar ball include OpenRC update?
Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.user
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 02:10:09 +0300
Message-ID: <iqhpcc$a9l$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <BANLkTiniBHST_x_=HgGoNhZRccJbR710Og@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=FoFXtZt2xZA34K2GCt_8uGYWy0g@mail.gmail.com> <3853574.JxeBK68k1L@eve>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.233.18.17
User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 6208d2973681f172dcaf8baf07aecf82
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
>> ?????baselayout?????????suffer,???
>=20
> huh?
>=20
Google Translate :
**Personal experience, baselayout how updates are in fact not suffer, Oh~=
=20
**
Xiangru Chen's translation is a bit better, I must admit.