[gentoo-user] depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[gentoo-user] depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1400 bytes --]

Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up 
for removal:

 sys-apps/dmidecode
    selected: 2.10 
   protected: none 
     omitted: none

I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about it?


Anyway, this confused me more:

  kde-base/okteta
    selected: 4.4.5 
   protected: none 
     omitted: none

okteta is not my world file.  So something brought it in.  It was not updated 
to v6, instead when I try to update it manually is asking for a second slot 
... is this normal?
=====================================================
# emerge -uaDv okteta

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  NS   ] kde-base/okteta-4.6.2 [4.4.5] USE="handbook (-aqua) -debug (-
kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)" 5,933 kB
[uninstall    ] kde-base/okteta-4.4.5  USE="handbook (-aqua) -debug (-
kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)" 
[blocks b     ] kde-base/okteta:4.6[-kdeprefix] ("kde-base/okteta:4.6[-
kdeprefix]" is blocking kde-base/okteta-4.4.5)
[blocks b     ] kde-base/okteta:4.4[-kdeprefix] ("kde-base/okteta:4.4[-
kdeprefix]" is blocking kde-base/okteta-4.6.2)

Total: 1 package (1 in new slot, 1 uninstall), Size of downloads: 5,933 kB
Conflict: 2 blocks
=====================================================

Why is this happening?
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1890 bytes --]

On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:28:22 you wrote:
> Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called
> up for removal:
> 
>  sys-apps/dmidecode
>     selected: 2.10
>    protected: none
>      omitted: none
> 
> I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about
> it?
> 
> 
> Anyway, this confused me more:
> 
>   kde-base/okteta
>     selected: 4.4.5
>    protected: none
>      omitted: none
> 
> okteta is not my world file.  So something brought it in.  It was not
> updated to v6, instead when I try to update it manually is asking for a
> second slot ... is this normal?
> =====================================================
> # emerge -uaDv okteta
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild  NS   ] kde-base/okteta-4.6.2 [4.4.5] USE="handbook (-aqua) -debug
> (- kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)" 5,933 kB
> [uninstall    ] kde-base/okteta-4.4.5  USE="handbook (-aqua) -debug (-
> kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)"
> [blocks b     ] kde-base/okteta:4.6[-kdeprefix] ("kde-base/okteta:4.6[-
> kdeprefix]" is blocking kde-base/okteta-4.4.5)
> [blocks b     ] kde-base/okteta:4.4[-kdeprefix] ("kde-base/okteta:4.4[-
> kdeprefix]" is blocking kde-base/okteta-4.6.2)
> 
> Total: 1 package (1 in new slot, 1 uninstall), Size of downloads: 5,933 kB
> Conflict: 2 blocks
> =====================================================
> 
> Why is this happening?

Similarly:

kde-base/libksane-4.4.5 does not seem to have been updated to kde-
base/libksane-4.6.2 ... as part of update world.

Shouldn't it have been?


Finally,  

kde-base/knetworkconf
    selected: 4.4.5 
   protected: none 
     omitted: none

Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version.  Has it been replaced 
by something else?
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote:
> Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up
> for removal:
>
>   sys-apps/dmidecode
>      selected: 2.10
>     protected: none
>       omitted: none
>
> I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about it?

Do you care?  Does it matter? :-)


> Anyway, this confused me more:
>
>    kde-base/okteta
>      selected: 4.4.5
>     protected: none
>       omitted: none
>
> okteta is not my world file.  So something brought it in.  It was not updated
> to v6, instead when I try to update it manually is asking for a second slot
> ... is this normal?

Yes, it's normal.  The slot will be installed, the old slot uninstalled. 
  Btw, okteta is a dep of kdevelop, which is only pulled-in when the 
"okteta" USE flag is enabled.  Maybe that's why you have it installed.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Paul Hartman]

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> kde-base/knetworkconf
>    selected: 4.4.5
>   protected: none
>     omitted: none
>
> Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version.  Has it been replaced
> by something else?

It was replaced by knetworkmanager

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Paul Hartman]

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up
> for removal:
>
> okteta is not my world file.  So something brought it in.  It was not updated
> to v6, instead when I try to update it manually is asking for a second slot
> ... is this normal?

If you add --tree to your emerge command you can see what's pulling it
in. I think it might be a dependency of kdevelop.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1526 bytes --]

On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being
> > called up
> > 
> > for removal:
> >   sys-apps/dmidecode
> >   
> >      selected: 2.10
> >     
> >     protected: none
> >     
> >       omitted: none
> > 
> > I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about
> > it?
> 
> Do you care?  Does it matter? :-)

It probably doesn't matter, but I don't know if it does and was curious.


> > Anyway, this confused me more:
> >    kde-base/okteta
> >    
> >      selected: 4.4.5
> >     
> >     protected: none
> >     
> >       omitted: none
> > 
> > okteta is not my world file.  So something brought it in.  It was not
> > updated to v6, instead when I try to update it manually is asking for a
> > second slot ... is this normal?
> 
> Yes, it's normal.  The slot will be installed, the old slot uninstalled.
>   Btw, okteta is a dep of kdevelop, which is only pulled-in when the
> "okteta" USE flag is enabled.  Maybe that's why you have it installed.

Ah!  Yes, that flag is now not there:

$ euse -i okteta
global use flags (searching: okteta)
************************************************************
no matching entries found

local use flags (searching: okteta)
************************************************************
[-    ] okteta (dev-util/kdevelop):
Enable hex editor plugin

Thanks!
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Mick]

On 12 May 2011 06:31, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote:
>> > Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being
>> > called up
>> >
>> > for removal:
>> >   sys-apps/dmidecode
>> >
>> >      selected: 2.10
>> >
>> >     protected: none
>> >
>> >       omitted: none
>> >
>> > I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about
>> > it?
>>
>> Do you care?  Does it matter? :-)
>
> It probably doesn't matter, but I don't know if it does and was curious.

Found what caused this.  My removing of hal which was pulling this in.

-- 
Regards,
Mick

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 740 bytes --]

On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:28 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> > kde-base/knetworkconf
> >    selected: 4.4.5
> >   protected: none
> >     omitted: none
> > 
> > Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version.  Has it been
> > replaced by something else?
> 
> It was replaced by knetworkmanager

Not sure it is.

knetworkconf-4.4.5 is part of kde-base family of packages and has no 
networkmanager support or indeed wicd, but knetworkmanager is part of kde-misc 
and has support for both (at least as far as their USE flags advise).

Also, knetworkconf was brought in as part kdeadmin-meta-4.4.5, knetworkmanager 
is not.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]