From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ5up-0004yH-1E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 15:29:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1615E0345; Sun, 8 May 2011 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA7CE0345 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B481B4062 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.857 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.857 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsZLiN-FIOIC for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 15:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94E41B404E for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 15:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ5tH-0003Tc-2Z for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:27:27 +0200 Received: from athedsl-373328.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.10.78]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:27:27 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-373328.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:27:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is there a "zypper ps" (from openSUSE) equivalent for Gentoo? Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 18:27:03 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <4DC562FB.7050209@j-schmitz.net> <201105080945.57075.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-373328.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110430 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <201105080945.57075.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 2ff264167db44e35b1a35e5354107a4f On 05/08/2011 10:45 AM, Dan Johansson wrote: > On Saturday 07 May 2011 20.32:01 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 05/07/2011 06:19 PM, justin wrote: >>> On 07/05/11 17:10, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>>> On openSUSE, there's a very helpful command after performing updates >>>> that tells me which running programs are using files that were just >>>> overwritten by updated copies. The command is "zypper ps". It helps to >>>> avoid rebooting the machine (as I have to do in Gentoo), since I know >>>> exactly what needs to be restarted (like X, sshd, etc.) >>>> >>>> Is there something like that in Gentoo? >>> >>> app-admin/lib_users > > And do not forget app-admin/checkrestart That one seems even better than lib_users; it also reports files other than *.so files.