* [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update
@ 2011-04-26 20:03 walt
2011-04-26 20:46 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction] walt
2011-04-27 19:29 ` [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update Volker Armin Hemmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2011-04-26 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has already
been removed from portage (a very bad decision).
The major problem is with libstartup-notification, which relies on a function
defined in xcb-util-0.3.6 and no longer exists in 0.3.8.
I'm going to try to recreate the ebuilds for 0.3.6, but meanwhile *don't* allow
xcb* to update to 0.3.8 if you depend on libstartup-notification.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction]
2011-04-26 20:03 [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update walt
@ 2011-04-26 20:46 ` walt
2011-04-27 19:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-04-27 19:29 ` [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update Volker Armin Hemmann
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2011-04-26 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 04/26/2011 01:03 PM, walt wrote:
> There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has already
> been removed from portage (a very bad decision).
Oops, my bad. x11-libs/xcb-util has just been split into several packages with
the update to 0.3.8.
If, like me, you need to downgrade xcb-util back to 0.3.6 you must delete all of
the xcb*0.3.8 packages first or you will get file collision errors.
The real breakage is in the libstartup-notification package, which hasn't been
fixed yet and still depends on xcb-util-0.3.6.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction]
2011-04-26 20:46 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction] walt
@ 2011-04-27 19:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-04-27 21:26 ` walt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Volker Armin Hemmann @ 2011-04-27 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 13:46:01 walt wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 01:03 PM, walt wrote:
> > There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has
> > already been removed from portage (a very bad decision).
>
> Oops, my bad. x11-libs/xcb-util has just been split into several packages
> with the update to 0.3.8.
>
> If, like me, you need to downgrade xcb-util back to 0.3.6 you must delete
> all of the xcb*0.3.8 packages first or you will get file collision errors.
>
> The real breakage is in the libstartup-notification package, which hasn't
> been fixed yet and still depends on xcb-util-0.3.6.
nope
behold:
[I] x11-libs/xcb-util
Available versions: 0.3.6{tbz2} (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {debug doc
static-libs test}
Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:13 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
test)
Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
[I] x11-libs/xcb-util-image
Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:53 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
test)
Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
[I] x11-libs/xcb-util-keysyms
Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:32 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
test)
Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
[I] x11-libs/xcb-util-renderutil
Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:18:35 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
test)
Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
[I] x11-libs/xcb-util-wm
Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:18:14 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
test)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction]
2011-04-27 19:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
@ 2011-04-27 21:26 ` walt
2011-04-27 21:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2011-04-27 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 04/27/2011 12:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2011 13:46:01 walt wrote:
>> On 04/26/2011 01:03 PM, walt wrote:
>>> There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has
>>> already been removed from portage (a very bad decision).
>>
>> Oops, my bad. x11-libs/xcb-util has just been split into several packages
>> with the update to 0.3.8.
>>
>> If, like me, you need to downgrade xcb-util back to 0.3.6 you must delete
>> all of the xcb*0.3.8 packages first or you will get file collision errors.
>>
>> The real breakage is in the libstartup-notification package, which hasn't
>> been fixed yet and still depends on xcb-util-0.3.6.
>
> nope
>
> behold:
>
> [I] x11-libs/xcb-util
> Available versions: 0.3.6{tbz2} (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {debug doc
> static-libs test}
> Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:13 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> test)
> Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
>
> [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-image
> Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
> Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:53 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> test)
> Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
>
> [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-keysyms
> Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
> Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:32 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> test)
> Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
>
> [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-renderutil
> Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
> Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:18:35 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> test)
> Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> Description: X C-language Bindings sample implementations
>
> [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-wm
> Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc static-libs test}
> Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:18:14 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> test)
Hi Volker. I may be misunderstanding your post. If I'm reading correctly,
you have all of the xcb-util-*-0.3.8 installed, as I did yesterday after the
routine update-world of my ~x86 and ~amd64 machines.
I had no problems building the xcb-util* updates, or even building the
libstartup-notification package.
The real problem is that libstartup-notification is expecting xcb-util to define
the function "xcb-atom-get", which AFAICT was eliminated from xcb-util-*-0.3.8.
#readelf -s libxcb-atom.so.1.0.0 | grep xcb_atom_get
16: 000019e0 137 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 xcb_atom_get <====== THIS ONE
28: 00001c90 42 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 xcb_atom_get_name_predefi
32: 00001cc0 246 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 xcb_atom_get_name
46: 00001b80 155 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 xcb_atom_get_fast
68: 00001c20 107 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 xcb_atom_get_fast_reply
83: 00001a70 271 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 xcb_atom_get_predefined
Can you find that symbol defined anywhere in xcb-util-*0.3.8? I looked but I
couldn't find it and then deleted all of the xcb*-0.3.8 packages.
Thanks for any hints.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction]
2011-04-27 21:26 ` walt
@ 2011-04-27 21:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-04-28 22:54 ` walt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Volker Armin Hemmann @ 2011-04-27 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 14:26:23 walt wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 12:31 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 April 2011 13:46:01 walt wrote:
> >> On 04/26/2011 01:03 PM, walt wrote:
> >>> There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has
> >>> already been removed from portage (a very bad decision).
> >>
> >> Oops, my bad. x11-libs/xcb-util has just been split into several
> >> packages with the update to 0.3.8.
> >>
> >> If, like me, you need to downgrade xcb-util back to 0.3.6 you must
> >> delete all of the xcb*0.3.8 packages first or you will get file
> >> collision errors.
> >>
> >> The real breakage is in the libstartup-notification package, which
> >> hasn't been fixed yet and still depends on xcb-util-0.3.6.
> >
> > nope
> >
> > behold:
> >
> > [I] x11-libs/xcb-util
> >
> > Available versions: 0.3.6{tbz2} (~)0.3.8{tbz2}
> > [M](~)9999[1] {debug doc
> >
> > static-libs test}
> >
> > Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:13 26.04.2011)(-doc
> > -static-libs -
> >
> > test)
> >
> > Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> > Description: X C-language Bindings sample
> > implementations
> >
> > [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-image
> >
> > Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc
> > static-libs test} Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:53
> > 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> >
> > test)
> >
> > Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> > Description: X C-language Bindings sample
> > implementations
> >
> > [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-keysyms
> >
> > Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc
> > static-libs test} Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:17:32
> > 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> >
> > test)
> >
> > Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> > Description: X C-language Bindings sample
> > implementations
> >
> > [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-renderutil
> >
> > Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc
> > static-libs test} Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:18:35
> > 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> >
> > test)
> >
> > Homepage: http://xcb.freedesktop.org/
> > Description: X C-language Bindings sample
> > implementations
> >
> > [I] x11-libs/xcb-util-wm
> >
> > Available versions: (~)0.3.8{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc
> > static-libs test} Installed versions: 0.3.8{tbz2}(19:18:14
> > 26.04.2011)(-doc -static-libs -
> >
> > test)
>
> Hi Volker. I may be misunderstanding your post. If I'm reading correctly,
> you have all of the xcb-util-*-0.3.8 installed, as I did yesterday after the
> routine update-world of my ~x86 and ~amd64 machines.
>
> I had no problems building the xcb-util* updates, or even building the
> libstartup-notification package.
>
> The real problem is that libstartup-notification is expecting xcb-util to
> define the function "xcb-atom-get", which AFAICT was eliminated from
> xcb-util-*-0.3.8.
>
and which symptoms are caused by this?
> #readelf -s libxcb-atom.so.1.0.0 | grep xcb_atom_get
don't have that lib.
only:
readelf -s /usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0| grep xcb_atom_get
34: 0000000000002c60 35 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11
xcb_atom_get_name_predefi
55: 0000000000002b60 230 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11
xcb_atom_get_predefined
and
equery belongs /usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0
* Searching for /usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0 ...
x11-libs/xcb-util-0.3.8 (/usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0)
no libxcb-atom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction]
2011-04-27 21:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
@ 2011-04-28 22:54 ` walt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2011-04-28 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 04/27/2011 02:40 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> #readelf -s libxcb-atom.so.1.0.0 | grep xcb_atom_get
> don't have that lib.
>
> only:
> readelf -s /usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0| grep xcb_atom_get
> 34: 0000000000002c60 35 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11
> xcb_atom_get_name_predefi
> 55: 0000000000002b60 230 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11
> xcb_atom_get_predefined
>
> and
> equery belongs /usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0
> * Searching for /usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0 ...
> x11-libs/xcb-util-0.3.8 (/usr/lib64/libxcb-util.so.0.0.0)
>
> no libxcb-atom
Thanks for your reply, Volker.
Yes, libxcb-atom was deleted by the upgrade to xcb-util-0.3.8, and, as
of this morning, x11-libs/startup-notification-0.10_p20110426 has the
fix for my missing-symbol problem :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update
2011-04-26 20:03 [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update walt
2011-04-26 20:46 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction] walt
@ 2011-04-27 19:29 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Volker Armin Hemmann @ 2011-04-27 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 13:03:59 walt wrote:
> There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has already
> been removed from portage (a very bad decision).
>
> The major problem is with libstartup-notification, which relies on a
> function defined in xcb-util-0.3.6 and no longer exists in 0.3.8.
>
> I'm going to try to recreate the ebuilds for 0.3.6, but meanwhile *don't*
> allow xcb* to update to 0.3.8 if you depend on libstartup-notification.
x11-libs/libxcb
Available versions: 1.7{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1] {doc selinux static-libs}
Installed versions: 1.7{tbz2}(06:17:00 13.03.2011)(-doc -selinux -
static-libs)
[I] x11-libs/startup-notification
Available versions: 0.10{tbz2} (~)0.10_p20110426{tbz2} [M](~)9999[1]
{static-libs}
Installed versions: 0.10_p20110426{tbz2}(19:19:07 26.04.2011)(-static-
libs)
as you can see, no problems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-28 22:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-26 20:03 [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update walt
2011-04-26 20:46 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction] walt
2011-04-27 19:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-04-27 21:26 ` walt
2011-04-27 21:40 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-04-28 22:54 ` walt
2011-04-27 19:29 ` [gentoo-user] Headsup: bad breakage from today's xcb update Volker Armin Hemmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox