From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-121992-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QEpAo-00064K-QT
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:47:55 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD2D1C018;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:46:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE91C018
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:46:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A69C1B4087
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:46:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.868
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.868 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.269,
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id eMeW9wcIpkXR for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:46:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97E51B407E
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:46:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1QEp9H-0001mG-9u
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:46:19 +0200
Received: from adsl-69-234-206-211.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.206.211])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:46:19 +0200
Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-206-211.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:46:19 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Headsup:  bad breakage from today's xcb update [correction]
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:46:01 -0700
Message-ID: <ip7auf$hav$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <ip78fl$1qr$1@dough.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-206-211.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110401 Thunderbird/3.3a3
In-Reply-To: <ip78fl$1qr$1@dough.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: c9f4ce7f5c14cc124ebc8c9a24e5b6b1

On 04/26/2011 01:03 PM, walt wrote:
> There is already a bug filed against xlibs/xcb*-0.3.8, and 0.3.6 has already
> been removed from portage (a very bad decision).

Oops, my bad.  x11-libs/xcb-util has just been split into several packages with
the update to 0.3.8.

If, like me, you need to downgrade xcb-util back to 0.3.6 you must delete all of
the xcb*0.3.8 packages first or you will get file collision errors.

The real breakage is in the libstartup-notification package, which hasn't been
fixed yet and still depends on xcb-util-0.3.6.