From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: mplayer vs mplayer2
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:19:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <imvs86$nhq$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110330174746.GA24232@omega>
On 03/30/2011 08:47 PM, du yang wrote:
> On Wednesday 03/30/11 17:14:00 CST, John Campbell wrote:
>> On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>
>>> I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
>>> or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
>>
>> It's in the multimedia overlay.
>>
>> The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available on processor)
>> parameter goes in the ~/.mplayer/config file. I've only got 4
>> processors so I set it to threads=4. You have an i7, so it should
>> handle more.
>>
>
> I just tried it also.
> Some 720p videos were very slow to play with mplayer on my machine prviously, but
> now they are playing smoothly ;-)
> So mplayer2 show have some performance improvement.
>
> After switching to maplyer2, putting mplayer to package.provided seems to be able to avoid dependencies problem for smplayer and mplayer-plugin..
The version in portage removed multithreading support :-( The
maintainer doesn't want the bundled, multithreaded ffmpeg that comes
with mplayer2. That's a good thing in the long run, but I've no idea
why they rushed it. They could wait till the in-portage libav or ffmpeg
becomes multithreaded before they strip the bundled one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-30 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 15:01 [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2 7v5w7go9ub0o
2011-03-30 8:00 ` John Campbell
2011-03-30 8:35 ` covici
2011-03-30 9:14 ` John Campbell
2011-03-30 9:37 ` Dale
2011-03-31 11:15 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-03-30 10:57 ` [gentoo-user] " covici
2011-03-30 17:47 ` du yang
2011-03-31 18:19 ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2011-03-31 11:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='imvs86$nhq$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=realnc@arcor.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox