From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4tOT-0003FV-TP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:16:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC9B61C07E; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B793A1C07E for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFBE1B41F9 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:15:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.768 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.768 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.358, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24=2.189] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UPyN4siMHSnn for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4BE1B4199 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4tN1-0005MO-B7 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:15:27 +0200 Received: from athedsl-375656.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.19.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:15:27 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-375656.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:15:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: mplayer vs mplayer2 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:15:14 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <4D91F44B.9020104@gmail.com> <4D92E321.7050101@cox.net> <32126.1301474147@ccs.covici.com> <4D92F458.9050200@cox.net> <4D92F9E9.4040600@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-375656.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110329 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <4D92F9E9.4040600@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 811ecaaf026380117fe05695033f6b5f On 03/30/2011 12:37 PM, Dale wrote: >[...] > I have it in the tree here: > > [-P-] [M~] media-video/mplayer2-2.0 (0) > [-P-] [M ] media-video/mplayer2-9999 (0) > > They are masked but it is there. Is that the same one? While I am at it, > is the plain mplayer going to be phased out and the new mplayer2 take > its place? It's not masked anymore. Also, mplayer2 is not a replacement for mplayer, it's a fork. I think mplayer still has the majority of the developers, so I don't think that it is in any danger of being "phased out."