public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [Waaay OT] Defrag tool for windoze
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:34:44 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ibu8ak$gal$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 201011160902.11978.joost@antarean.org

On 2010-11-16, J. Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org> wrote:

>> spinrite claims to make the head do other things than what the drive
>> firmware makes it do.

I'm afraid I'll have to call bullshit on that.  I don't see how some
bit of PC software can make a drive head move.  The firmware on the
drive controller board is the only thing that can make the head move.
Does spinrite claim they _replace_ the drive firmware with their own
custom version?

Where does Spinrite's claim they can do override drive firmware?

I don't see any claims like that on their web site?

>> Meaning that spinrite can extract data that the drive itself in
>> normal conditions cannot. This reasoning is sound.

I've no problem with the reasoning.  I, however, don't accept the
premise.

> True, provided it actually knows HOW to override the firmware on all
> drives currently in use...

I doubt that it can.

>> Remember that a drive is an analogue device, not a digital one (only
>> the *output data* is digital).
>
> Ofcourse, but is the head actually sensitive enough to be able to
> cooperate with this? Professional data recovery companies actually
> take out the platters and use their own drive-heads to get the data
> out.
>
>> There is some doubt as to whether spinrite can even function in this
>> wise with modern drives though.
>
> Yes, and that's exactly my point. Something that overrides the drives
> firmware can, in my view, easily brick the drive.

If spinrite is replacing the drive's firmware, then in theory they
might be able to do something "extra", but I'd say the odds of them
being able to reverse-engineer enough the drives out there enough to do
their own custom firmware for all of a significant number of them is
pretty close to 0.

Besides, their web site explicitly states that they can't do low level
formatting, they run under DOS, and that they can only use drives that
are recogized by the mothoerboard BIOS.  AFAICT, they're just using
the normal IDE/ATA API and are doing nothing extraordinary.


-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Hey, wait
                                  at               a minute!!  I want a
                              gmail.com            divorce!! ... you're not
                                                   Clint Eastwood!!




  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-16 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-15  3:56 [gentoo-user] [Waaay OT] Defrag tool for windoze Dale
2010-11-15  4:32 ` Jacob Todd
2010-11-15  6:55   ` Dale
2010-11-15  8:52 ` Stroller
2010-11-15  9:32   ` Dale
2010-11-15  9:46     ` J. Roeleveld
2010-11-15 11:01       ` Peter Humphrey
2010-11-15 11:59         ` J. Roeleveld
2010-11-15 12:47       ` Mick
2010-11-15 13:13     ` Jacob Todd
2010-11-15 14:15       ` Mick
2010-11-15 14:50         ` Jacob Todd
2010-11-15 15:10           ` J. Roeleveld
2010-11-15 17:07             ` Alan McKinnon
2010-11-16  8:02               ` J. Roeleveld
2010-11-16 15:34                 ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2010-11-16 16:20                   ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2010-11-16 17:08                     ` Mick
2010-11-16 17:37                     ` Peter Humphrey
2010-11-16 18:10                     ` Grant Edwards
2010-11-16 18:18                     ` BRM
2010-11-15 15:33           ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
2010-11-15 15:17 ` BRM
2010-11-15 16:05 ` Florian Philipp
2010-11-15 17:43   ` Mike Edenfield
2010-11-15 18:05     ` BRM
2010-11-15 19:52     ` Alan McKinnon
2010-11-15 22:01       ` Dale
2010-11-15 22:41         ` Alan McKinnon
2010-11-15 23:36           ` Dale
2010-11-16  0:37             ` Mark Knecht
2010-11-16  4:52             ` Stroller
2010-11-16  5:28               ` Dale
2010-11-16  1:12           ` Adam Carter
2010-11-16  2:33             ` Dale
2010-11-16  3:40               ` Adam Carter
2010-11-16  8:16               ` J. Roeleveld
2010-11-16  9:53                 ` Alex Schuster
2010-11-16 10:04                   ` J. Roeleveld
2010-11-16  9:57                 ` Alex Schuster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='ibu8ak$gal$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=grant.b.edwards@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox