From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115278-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P1OxS-0004le-1H
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:38:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22D46E07FD;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B60E07FD
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B821F1B418C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.302,
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ZK0SYUOM-nZD for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C551B4174
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1P1Owc-0003Fd-EI
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:37:30 +0200
Received: from adsl-69-234-214-85.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.214.85])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:37:30 +0200
Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-214-85.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:37:30 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: firefox-bin optimizations?
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:37:10 -0700
Message-ID: <i82otf$ith$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com> <4CA47BEE.8050906@gmx.de> <AANLkTim4nshaLPaTi7fCCobB5U18EHMk1b-B2oS5wJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-214-85.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100930 Thunderbird/3.3a1pre
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim4nshaLPaTi7fCCobB5U18EHMk1b-B2oS5wJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 0541b745-97a7-4596-946f-773b96a91e92
X-Archives-Hash: 82a004d482fcba9b529632eaf6231a68

On 09/30/2010 05:30 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Johannes Kimmel<johannes.kimmel@gmx.de>  wrote:
>> On 09/30/2010 12:58 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>>
>>> Heya,
>>> I noticed that my firefox-bin is a lot smaller in memory footprint
>>> compared to ordinary gentoo-compiled firefox.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know what compiler flags upstream applies to their
>>> firefox?

Try entering about:buildconfig in the URL bar.