From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OZuto-0007hA-HX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:05:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD44AE0ABF for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7287E0A90 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809931B412F for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:03:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.902 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.303, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gCA56fPAujYM for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF851B406E for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZus7-0001ty-LJ for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:03:15 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-185-91.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.185.91]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:03:15 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-185-91.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:03:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Any centralized documentation on qemu-kvm? Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:03:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100714035427.GA3812@waltdnes.org> <20100716041345.GA10644@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-185-91.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; en-US; rv:2.0b2pre) Gecko/20100715 Shredder/3.2a1pre In-Reply-To: <20100716041345.GA10644@waltdnes.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8e15b867-1779-434d-85af-36b9d60a326b X-Archives-Hash: 9a56ff3838367392b2606b4bca30e70a On 07/15/2010 09:13 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:15:59PM -0700, walt wrote > >> Well, wait a sec. I track both qemu and qemu-kvm from their git >> repositories rather than the gentoo packages, so YMMV. > > [...deletia...] > >> qemu-kvm does not supply a command named 'qemu', so there is no name >> conflict in that particular case. > > Gentoo seems to differ... > > waltdnes@i3 ~ $ equery belongs `which qemu` > [ Searching for file(s) /usr/bin/qemu in *... ] > app-emulation/qemu-kvm-0.12.4-r1 (/usr/bin/qemu) Interesting. Maybe the gentoo packages add a wrapper script to allow both to be installed in /usr/bin? Is /usr/bin/qemu a binary, or a script?