From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUUwQ-0001IL-OG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:21:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A272BE09C4; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80222E09C4 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5801B4575 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:20:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.896 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.896 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbZpm5GAm7lK for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120841B4029 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUUvh-0003u5-95 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:20:33 +0200 Received: from 68.168.167.146 ([68.168.167.146]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:20:33 +0200 Received: from grant.b.edwards by 68.168.167.146 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:20:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.168.167.146 User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 633569b9-1f13-4b63-9753-8879ed8f2c80 X-Archives-Hash: 69e2075ba12184993e6009c1559b88d1 On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing > lists I use don't do that. > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it > permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole > mailing list. > > What do you think about changing of policy? I'd rather not get replies sent directly to my address, so I prefer it the way it is. -- Grant