From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-112235-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OTlzL-0004aT-DY
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:21:19 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DADD7E0D28;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:20:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3426E0D28
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:20:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6247465175
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:20:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.919
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.919 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.320,
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id BwOII0MGRcpJ for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D511B42F0
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:20:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1OTlyC-00023B-B7
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:20:08 +0200
Received: from adsl-69-234-180-206.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.180.206])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:20:08 +0200
Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-180-206.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:20:08 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: VM experiences and faqs?
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:20:08 -0700
Message-ID: <i0e640$8fl$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <20100628061927.GC12220@waltdnes.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-180-206.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:2.0b2pre) Gecko/20100629 Thunderbird/3.2a1pre
In-Reply-To: <20100628061927.GC12220@waltdnes.org>
X-Archives-Salt: b8d126a1-7466-4638-8ac3-867fbe68ae19
X-Archives-Hash: aed0ff7756a8139fc184a8bebaa96b07

On 06/27/2010 11:19 PM, waltdnes@waltdnes.org wrote:
 > ...
>I want to try hosting 32-bit Gentoo and also OS/2 Warp 4...

I've found VirtualBox to be a bit faster than kvm only because of
their highly optimized graphics driver.

The vbox gui is also nice, but requires qt4 (a pain for us gnome
users).  Anyone know if kvm has a similar gui for managing virtual
machines?

But my real reason for replying is to ask you why you're interested
in OS/2.  I thought IBM lost interest in it ages ago.  Am I wrong?