From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPnQg-0001bm-Di for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:05:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F043E08AF for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF04E0810 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B491B4010 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.926 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.926 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.327, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGmLaseD1VHk for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905B81B4043 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPmww-0004lo-QV for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:34:22 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-213-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.213.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:34:22 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-213-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:34:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org connect(): No such file or directory From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub2 and use-flags Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:38:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <201006190000.09543.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-213-180.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.3a6pre) Gecko/20100618 Thunderbird/3.2a1pre In-Reply-To: <201006190000.09543.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8f08cc8b-4b9e-475b-acc4-9d9e44279034 X-Archives-Hash: 1a5612cd5622e5cb3b1cedc67b018ec9 On 06/18/2010 04:00 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Friday 18 June 2010 19:05:17 Vaeth wrote: >>> I'm running grub 2 it seems >> >> No. You are running grub 0.97-r9 (which is a legacy grub): > > I'm puzzled. This is a reply to the OP, but you've cast it as a reply to > me. Why? Heh. I think both of you may be using broken newsreaders. Vaeth's reply uses the wrong article number as a 'reference', so his post is actually an orphan in this thread. And your KMail should not be threading his post as a reply to yours because it wasn't. It was a reply to an article number that doesn't belong in this thread at all. Computers are a mystery sometimes.