From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OBHTl-0002G8-3U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 01:08:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36239E0768; Mon, 10 May 2010 01:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE120E0768 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 01:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5267E1B4031 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 01:07:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.956 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.956 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.357, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kui3tbNMojiC for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 01:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F281B401A for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 01:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBHSU-0006NY-EO for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 03:06:58 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-211-254.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.211.254]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 03:06:58 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-211-254.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 03:06:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org connect(): No such file or directory From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: libpng12 is missing Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 18:11:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <201005091937.54289.rudmer.van.dijk@casema.nl> <201005092054.44760.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-211-254.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100508 Thunderbird/3.2a1pre In-Reply-To: <201005092054.44760.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: d2ad8d14-eb17-424b-8c4a-62e7eb5b94bf X-Archives-Hash: aaf27014bfc5f0cf9ba4a9fc229edc1f On 05/09/2010 11:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > and walt: > preserved libs. Look into it. A long time ago, maybe one or two years ago, an occasional package would suggest that I should run emerge @preserved-rebuild to rebuild packages that are linked to obsolete libraries. This worked very well for a few months, and then those suggestions suddenly stopped coming. Since then, emerge @preserved-rebuild (or @preserved-libs) says this: #emerge @preserved-rebuild !!! '@preserved-rebuild' is not a valid package atom. !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details. I get the same error on my x86 and ~amd64 machines, i.e. with either baselayout-1 or baselayout-2. The man pages for ebuild, emerge, portage, and make.conf say nothing about 'preserved'. Anyone have an idea what changed, or what I'm doing wrong?