From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O9Rup-0004u2-HE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 23:52:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EA5FE073F; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1F0E073F for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1392B1B401A for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:51:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.96 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.96 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-0kOZYLAY0Y for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D431B4041 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 23:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9RtS-0002or-D6 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 01:51:14 +0200 Received: from adsl-69-234-206-240.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.206.240]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 01:51:14 +0200 Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-206-240.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 01:51:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org connect(): No such file or directory From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:51:08 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4BDFF195.9070404@xunil.at> <4BE05BA3.1000509@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-206-240.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100504 Thunderbird/3.2a1pre In-Reply-To: <4BE05BA3.1000509@xunil.at> X-Archives-Salt: 7d498538-bf2a-42ab-9873-110ecbdc5309 X-Archives-Hash: 2fb0997519f0c50c9361e431605efdee On 05/04/2010 10:38 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 04.05.2010 18:54, schrieb walt: > >>> pam_mount(mount.c): crypt_activate_by_passphrase: Operation not >>> permitted >> >> I don't have a pam_mount, where does it come from? Perhaps it needs >> a reference to pam_ssh.so? > > What do you mean with "where does it come from?" ? > > It's in portage ... Okay, I'm assuming pam_mount.so and mount.crypt come from the sys-auth/ pam_mount package but I can't check because all of those packages are masked by the ~x86 keyword at the moment. > Could it be the case that my current setup somehow uses "the new API" > which isn't available yet in some package? > > I don't yet have the whole picture ... Daniel knows more than I do about this subject, so I recommend that you follow his advice. However, all of the pam_mount packages being masked at the same time makes me suspect that not everything is working exactly as it should. I'll follow this thread, hoping to learn more.