public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple versions of automake?
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:45:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <hn8pbu$g2n$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hn8gm0$d1r$1@dough.gmane.org>

On 03/10/2010 06:17 PM, walt wrote:
> On 03/10/2010 05:50 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I currently have 3 versions of automake installed (1.7.9-r1, 1.9.6-r3,
>> and 1.10.2).
>>
>> emerge -pvuDN world shows an update available for each one, but, my
>> question is, do I need all 3 versions?
>>
>> 'equery depends automake' shows 44 packages, all depending on 1.10* or
>> higher.
>>
>> So, can I safely emerge -C the other 2 versions? Should I (does it even
>> matter)?
>
> Probably won't matter. A few packages actually specify an exact version
> of the autotools, but most just want a certain minimum version.

Portage doesn't allow ebuilds to specify minimum versions or ranges for 
automake, only exact versions.

Specifying a mininum only works when putting automake as a dep in 
DEPEND.  However, Gentoo devs are required to use WANT_AUTOMAKE, not 
DEPEND and WANT_AUTOMAKE only allows specific versions, not minimum ones.

And this means multiple automake versions on the system are perfectly 
normal.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-10 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-10 13:50 [gentoo-user] Multiple versions of automake? Tanstaafl
2010-03-10 14:15 ` Alan McKinnon
2010-03-10 16:17 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2010-03-10 18:45   ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2010-03-10 20:04     ` Tanstaafl
2010-03-10 21:42     ` walt
2010-03-10 17:05 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
2010-03-10 20:16   ` Tanstaafl
2010-03-10 21:03     ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-03-10 21:05     ` [gentoo-user] " Paul Hartman
2010-03-11 15:46       ` Tanstaafl
2010-03-10 21:09     ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='hn8pbu$g2n$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=realnc@arcor.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox