public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Who believes in cylinders?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:09:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <hm9nqu$66g$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)

There's been some talk here recently about partitions versus cylinder
boundaries, and when or even if they need to line up properly.

I'm confused.  For many years now I've ignored "cylinders" completely
because I've read that modern disks are addressed by sector number only,
and disks don't know or care about cylinders.  The "cylinder" seems to
be a fiction that sticks around like a drunk who refuses to leave when
the party is over.

The recent thread about the new disks with 1024-byte sectors has me
even more confused.

IIUC the new disks *do* care (at least) about where a partition
begins relative to it's own 1024-byte hardware sectors, and that
part makes perfect sense.

But, to me, that still leaves the "cylinder" as a completely useless
fiction that needs to join MSDOS in the scrap heap of history.

Am I right to separate the 1024-byte sector problem from "cylinders"
as being two entirely different and orthogonal ideas?

Is there really any need for the "cylinder" these days?

Happy Friday :)




             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-27  0:09 walt [this message]
2010-02-27  0:22 ` [gentoo-user] Who believes in cylinders? Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-02-27  1:31 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-27  2:23   ` BRM
2010-02-27 16:53     ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2010-02-27 18:04       ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-27 18:17       ` BRM
2010-02-27 18:20         ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2010-02-28 11:13           ` Mick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='hm9nqu$66g$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=w41ter@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox