From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nl4yR-0005g2-Qe for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:31:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A552E095A; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D8AE095A for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BDF1B4030 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:31:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.035 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.035 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.436, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxnlNxXT5akj for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048321B4696 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nl4xg-0008UI-R2 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:52 +0100 Received: from athedsl-393823.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.90.93]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:52 +0100 Received: from realnc by athedsl-393823.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:30:41 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <306987.3768.qm@web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4B875E96.4040203@gmail.com> <332309.70376.qm@web65405.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <201002261610.55394.wonko@wonkology.org> <399126.91449.qm@web65404.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-393823.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100206 Thunderbird/3.0.1 In-Reply-To: <399126.91449.qm@web65404.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Archives-Salt: 1290894d-1246-4be4-baae-2793539a2db9 X-Archives-Hash: 4c9b48166c9bf21d4ed029b4a09daafb On 02/26/2010 06:10 PM, BRM wrote: >[...] >> From: Alex Schuster >>> That's the only issue. My only concern is software (e.g. KDevelop) that >>> may not have been updated to KDE4 yet. (Not a fan of KDevelop3; >>> waiting to see how KDevelop4 is going to shape up.) >> The KDE4 version is in the kde overlay, but I do not know if it is usable >> already. > > For now, I'll wait. I mostly use vim; and having done a lot of Windows stuff for work I am familiar with VS. > While there are a lot of things I don't like about VS, nothing else seems to quite compare. > KDevelop3 at least drove me nuts; and Eclipse just doesn't do well when you're not programming in Java - I have yet to get CDT to work, though I've mostly tried on Windows. > QtCreator seems to be on the right track, though it's still quite early. > > I'm interested to see how KDevelop4 is going to turn out, but I'll certainly wait for it to reach the mainline tree. The KDevelop 4 is actually in Portage (dev-util/kdevelop:4), not only in the kde overlay. I have both Kdev4 and Qt Creator installed. I ended up going with Creator, but I'm still keeping an eye on Kdev4.