public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:30:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <hm940e$ib$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <399126.91449.qm@web65404.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>

On 02/26/2010 06:10 PM, BRM wrote:
>[...]
>> From: Alex Schuster<wonko@wonkology.org>
>>> That's the only issue. My only concern is software (e.g. KDevelop) that
>>> may not have been updated to KDE4 yet. (Not a fan of KDevelop3;
>>> waiting to see how KDevelop4 is going to shape up.)
>> The KDE4 version is in the kde overlay, but I do not know if it is usable
>> already.
>
> For now, I'll wait. I mostly use vim; and having done a lot of Windows stuff for work I am familiar with VS.
> While there are a lot of things I don't like about VS, nothing else seems to quite compare.
> KDevelop3 at least drove me nuts; and Eclipse just doesn't do well when you're not programming in Java - I have yet to get CDT to work, though I've mostly tried on Windows.
> QtCreator seems to be on the right track, though it's still quite early.
>
> I'm interested to see how KDevelop4 is going to turn out, but I'll certainly wait for it to reach the mainline tree.

The KDevelop 4 is actually in Portage (dev-util/kdevelop:4), not only in 
the kde overlay.

I have both Kdev4 and Qt Creator installed.  I ended up going with 
Creator, but I'm still keeping an eye on Kdev4.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-26 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-26  4:06 [gentoo-user] Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? BRM
2010-02-26  4:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-26  5:39   ` Dale
2010-02-26 14:34     ` BRM
2010-02-26 15:10       ` Alex Schuster
2010-02-26 16:10         ` BRM
2010-02-26 18:30           ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2010-02-26 18:01       ` Dale
2010-02-26 23:20       ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27  0:24         ` Dale
2010-02-27  2:15         ` BRM
2010-02-27  3:11           ` Dale
2010-02-27  4:34             ` BRM
2010-02-27  5:15               ` Dale
2010-02-27 11:38             ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27  3:19           ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-27  3:45             ` Dale
2010-02-27  5:21               ` BRM
2010-02-27  6:53                 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-27  7:21                   ` Mick
2010-02-27 11:39                   ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 11:41                 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 17:12                   ` Dale
2010-02-27 18:26                     ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 19:16                       ` Dale
2010-02-27 19:42                         ` BRM
2010-02-27 20:16                           ` Dale
2010-02-27 11:42               ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='hm940e$ib$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=realnc@arcor.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox