From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-102739-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N3u0u-0003C5-GX
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:44 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA832E07B3;
	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B0CE07B3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518586712C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.162
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.162 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.563,
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 9ezh-NhACRvm for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8A164140
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1N3u0P-0005Zw-JX
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:07:13 +0100
Received: from athedsl-378961.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.32.79])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:07:13 +0100
Received: from realnc by athedsl-378961.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:07:13 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From:  Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-user]  Re: firefox-3.5.4 & xulrunner version
Date:  Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:06:59 +0200
Organization:  Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <hcf2uv$sfu$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <87d444q4w6.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-378961.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091019 Thunderbird/3.0b4
In-Reply-To: <87d444q4w6.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: f739209a-f8c2-43d8-ab11-02d7505f84e6
X-Archives-Hash: 430c8ee9ded4c78bbe76c4deffee6003

On 10/30/2009 05:26 PM, Graham Murray wrote:
> The ebuild for mozilla-firefox-3.5.4 has been changed to force
> ~xulrunner-1.9.1.3. As xulrunner-1.9.1.4 was put into the tree at the
> same time as firefox-3.5.4 and is shown as a security fix, is it right
> that mozilla-firefox-3.5.4 is forcing the downgrade to
> xulrunner-1.9.1.3-r1 (which is dated before the security fixes)?

Seeing no explanation for it in ChangeLog, this looks like an oversight.