* [gentoo-user] Wine users backup libjpeg.so.62.0.0
@ 2009-10-20 3:39 waltdnes
2009-10-20 5:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-10-20 20:29 ` Jörg Schaible
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: waltdnes @ 2009-10-20 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Users List
MAKE SURE TO BACKUP libjpeg.so.62.0.0 and libjpeg.so.62 (a symlink to
libjpeg.so.62.0.0)
My older machine was getting flakey so I migrated to my newer machine.
I updated the new machine to the latest everything, and got a message
that I could delete libjpeg.so.62 (a symlink to libjpeg.so.62.0.0) in
/usr/lib (that's where it is on my Gentoo system). Bad move... Wine no
longer ran. Fortunately, I had not updated my older machine, so I was
able to copy the files over from it, and Wine is now running. The weird
part is that I followed instructions, and ran the revdep-rebuild. It
claimed there were no dynamic links to libjpeg.so.62
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Wine users backup libjpeg.so.62.0.0
2009-10-20 3:39 [gentoo-user] Wine users backup libjpeg.so.62.0.0 waltdnes
@ 2009-10-20 5:48 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-10-20 20:29 ` Jörg Schaible
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2009-10-20 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 10/20/2009 06:39 AM, waltdnes@waltdnes.org wrote:
> MAKE SURE TO BACKUP libjpeg.so.62.0.0 and libjpeg.so.62 (a symlink to
> libjpeg.so.62.0.0)
>
> My older machine was getting flakey so I migrated to my newer machine.
> I updated the new machine to the latest everything, and got a message
> that I could delete libjpeg.so.62 (a symlink to libjpeg.so.62.0.0) in
> /usr/lib (that's where it is on my Gentoo system). Bad move... Wine no
> longer ran. Fortunately, I had not updated my older machine, so I was
> able to copy the files over from it, and Wine is now running. The weird
> part is that I followed instructions, and ran the revdep-rebuild. It
> claimed there were no dynamic links to libjpeg.so.62
Did you rebuild Wine? It runs just fine here with media-libs/jpeg-7.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Wine users backup libjpeg.so.62.0.0
2009-10-20 3:39 [gentoo-user] Wine users backup libjpeg.so.62.0.0 waltdnes
2009-10-20 5:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2009-10-20 20:29 ` Jörg Schaible
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Schaible @ 2009-10-20 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
waltdnes@waltdnes.org wrote:
> MAKE SURE TO BACKUP libjpeg.so.62.0.0 and libjpeg.so.62 (a symlink to
> libjpeg.so.62.0.0)
No. Simply emerge jpeg-compat to get back a stable system.
> My older machine was getting flakey so I migrated to my newer machine.
> I updated the new machine to the latest everything, and got a message
> that I could delete libjpeg.so.62 (a symlink to libjpeg.so.62.0.0) in
> /usr/lib (that's where it is on my Gentoo system). Bad move... Wine no
> longer ran. Fortunately, I had not updated my older machine, so I was
> able to copy the files over from it, and Wine is now running. The weird
> part is that I followed instructions, and ran the revdep-rebuild. It
> claimed there were no dynamic links to libjpeg.so.62
Run "redev-rebuild --library libjpeg.so.62" (as told by the elog). Then you
can unmerge jpeg-compat again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-20 20:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-20 3:39 [gentoo-user] Wine users backup libjpeg.so.62.0.0 waltdnes
2009-10-20 5:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-10-20 20:29 ` Jörg Schaible
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox