From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-100635-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Mpmjh-0001wU-KF
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:31:37 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26787E075B;
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BE2E075B
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFEB67679
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.321 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.722,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IVidJEXsJmXu for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:31:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAF366F87
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:31:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1MpmjQ-0001i7-H3
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:31:20 +0200
Received: from adsl-69-234-189-182.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([69.234.189.182])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:31:20 +0200
Received: from w41ter by adsl-69-234-189-182.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:31:20 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Shutting down process hangs - how to proceed?
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:30:59 -0700
Message-ID: <h98d8h$rbe$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090919112559.GA27909@solfire> <4AB4C4DE.5050707@coolmail.se> <20090919123107.GB10187@solfire> <h93k8t$p2b$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090920000731.GA5740@solfire> <h93vbm$f26$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090920021704.GB5740@solfire> <h95k6j$aq8$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090920161552.GC5807@solfire> <h95nt8$l6j$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090921024057.GB5792@solfire>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-234-189-182.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090921 Shredder/3.0pre
In-Reply-To: <20090921024057.GB5792@solfire>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: cfecdb84-95eb-4d34-be56-f03432cdc9a6
X-Archives-Hash: 465cbbc31d1dcd5da2495e519d16ef09
On 09/20/2009 07:40 PM, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote:
> walt<w41ter@gmail.com> [09-09-21 02:32]:
>> On 09/20/2009 09:15 AM, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>l /etc/asound.state
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10122 2009-08-06 18:05 /etc/asound.state
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>sudo rm -f /etc/asound.state
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>sudo alsactl store
>>> alsactl: get_control:249: Cannot read control '2,0,0,Mic Capture
>>> Volume,0': Invalid argument
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>
>>
>> I also have /etc/asound.names, which was apparently created a year ago
>> by "alsactl names" (now deprecated). If you have that file it should
>> also be deleted.
>
> If alsactl is deprecated -- what to use instead?
Sorry, only the "names" flag is deprecated, not alsactl.